Skip to main content

Stop using Validation of Debt (VOD) letters on credit cards!

I'm going to put out another video this week on the validation of debt (VOD) letters because I've getting a ton of calls this week where people are using them in such an incorrect manner that they're screwing up their files before I ever touch them!
Although I'm going to be doing the video, I want to put a quick message out there:
Do NOT use this type of dispute letter with credit card collection agencies and original creditors! Disputing direclty with the original creditor is a 623 dispute letter, NOT a VOD.
Here's an exception:
There's a collection account (such as Portolio Recovery, Second Round, Cavalry, Midland, etc.) that is truly unknown to you because you never had a credit card before - you can use the VOD on this with the collection agency.
If you send a VOD letter with FDCPA statutes in it, you'll receive a reply that says they are not liable under the FDCPA. You'll have wasted 2+ weeks. On the other hand, if you send a VOD letter WITHOUT the FDCPA listed anywhere on the dispute letter, it may work for you.
My point is this:
You need to be VERY careful with these "direct to creditor/collection" dispute letters. There's a time and place for them and it needs to be handled in a manner that doesn't put you in their line of fire and that doesn't take away your right to sue.
The FCRA states that you must first dispute with the credit bureaus prior to a creditor dispute. Otherwise, you cannot take the creditor(s) to court. Having said that, why would you only dispute with the creditor? Or why would you send a FDCPA letter to an original creditor? Or a 623 dispute to a collection agency? Or a 609 dispute to anyone other than the bureaus?
I'll go into more detail during the video, so make sure you watch out for it! You may subscribe at youtube.com/expertcreditsweeps
If you need immediate assistance with your current VOD/623/609/1681 credit repair issues, give us a call for expert advice at 845-481-0780.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

1000s of collections removed with this FREE VOD letter!

I'm giving you the 1st of a 4-letter collection removal campaign that's removed thousands of collections in the past 12 months for FREE! You'll find the link to the letter in the video. Believe me, if you're even 1/2 as successful as my other clients, you'll be very, very impressed. For those of you who need some help, I provide a free consultation to take over your file and do the dirty work for you. For those of you DIY-ers, I provide 3 new DIY packages on the new services page of the website. You may also request a 1-hour session to go over your file and get my advice and an action plan @ $85 p/h. Just schedule an appt on the website. Check it all out at https://www.expertcreditsweeps.com/

Is a credit sweep the same thing as claiming identity theft?

Is a credit sweep the same thing as claiming identity theft? No, it's not. Most consumers have the wrong idea about what a credit sweep is and believe the 2 are the same but I'm here to clear this up for you! Identity theft: This is where you claim that all (or a few) items are resulting from identity theft and you attempt to get them blocked using section 605B of the FCRA within 4 business days. You must use an official police report and affidavit. Here's the DL on this: it doesn't work. Why? Because millions of consumers used this illegally even thought the debts actually belonged to them and now, even if you ARE a victim, it's almost impossible to get it done in 4 business days. A few months? Sure, if you have all the required documentation, dispute with the creditors as well and have supporting documentation. IF this method is used (either by the consumer or a credit repair company - with or without the consumer's knowledge), the items w

Credit Repair Dispute Reason Cheat Sheet

Use this Dispute Progression chart (cheat sheet) to craft your dispute reasons when writing your dispute letter for credit repair purposes. Buy for only $15 at expertcreditsweeps.com/store or directly at https://gumroad.com/l/disputereasons Stop using TEMPLATES! Start thinking logically and create your disputes based on "factual" information. This means that you take the info on the credit report and base your disputes on it. This covers ALL negative item types and falls into 6 categories: Collections Charge-offs Late Payments Inquiries Identity Theft Bankruptcies Judgements/tax liens *all negative items fall into these categories, including foreclosures, student loans, repossessions, etc. i.e. charge-off with 3 different dates listed under "date of last activity" dispute reason: remove this account immediately due to the fact that you're reporting 3 different dates under "date of last activity" and this is inaccurate This PDF